<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>postmodem &#187; Logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postmodem.co.uk/category/web-graphic-design/logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postmodem.co.uk</link>
	<description>Daryl's ramblings and rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What on earth were Microsoft thinking? The Bing disaster.</title>
		<link>http://www.postmodem.co.uk/2009/06/02/what-on-earth-were-microsoft-thinking-the-bing-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.postmodem.co.uk/2009/06/02/what-on-earth-were-microsoft-thinking-the-bing-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web and Graphic Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postmodem.co.uk/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The launch of Microsoft&#8217;s rebranded search engine &#8220;bing&#8221; on the 1st of June has left me completely speechless. Not through admiration I hasten to add but because it&#8217;s all been done so badly! This has to be the web equivalent of rubbernecking at a car crash &#8211; so please drive carefully. The first I saw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The launch of Microsoft&#8217;s rebranded search engine &#8220;bing&#8221; on the 1st of June has left me completely speechless.  Not through admiration I hasten to add but because it&#8217;s all been done so badly!  This has to be the web equivalent of rubbernecking at a car crash &#8211; so please drive carefully.</p>
<p>The first I saw of the new bing logo was via <a href="http://imjustcreative.com/the-bing-logo-design-by-microsoft-vent-off-here/2009/05/29/">this post</a> over at the <strong>imjustcreative</strong> blog.  I&#8217;m with Graham completely, it&#8217;s amazing that a company the size of Microsoft would actually sign off on such a badly designed logo.  In contrast, take a look at the new logo for Google Wave &#8211; it&#8217;s pure simplicity in echoing the colours of the Google brand whilst creating a wave with the letter W is a definite win.  Look at the logo&#8217;s side-by-side and see what you think.<span id="more-47"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_52" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-52" title="logocompare" src="http://www.postmodem.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/logocompare.jpg" alt="Comparison of the new logo's from Microsoft and Google" width="600" height="236" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparison of the new logo&#39;s from Microsoft and Google</p></div>
<p>The rebranding car wreck doesn&#8217;t end there though.  Not happy with just creating a shockingly bad logo for bing the designers of <a href="http://www.discoverbing.com/tour/">this launch micro-site</a> (which I assume is being used to herald the new dawn of Bing to the world) have blatantly ripped an idea from this site:  <a href="http://dragoninteractive.com/" target="_blank">dragoninteractive.com</a>.  Of course, it goes without saying that the Dragon Interactive site is far superior in many ways &#8211; but why have Microsoft so obviously <strong>not</strong> invested time in the design of these sites let alone the bing logo?</p>
<div id="attachment_53" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-53" title="bingmicrosite" src="http://www.postmodem.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bingmicrosite.jpg" alt="The 'rip-off' bing micro-site" width="600" height="250" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The &#39;rip-off&#39; bing micro-site</p></div>
<div id="attachment_54" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-54" title="disite" src="http://www.postmodem.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/disite.jpg" alt="The far superior dragon interactive site" width="600" height="250" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The far superior dragon interactive site</p></div>
<p>And then there are the other micro-sites <a href="http://www.discoverbing.com/behindbing/">like this</a> which uses Silverlight of all things when it&#8217;s completely unnecessary.  What also strikes me though is that the micro-sites sitting under <a href="http://www.discoverbing.com/">http://www.discoverbing.com/</a> have no clear brand continuity.</p>
<div id="attachment_57" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-57" title="bing_behindscenes" src="http://www.postmodem.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bing_behindscenes.jpg" alt="Why Silverlight??" width="600" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Why Silverlight??</p></div>
<p>Bring back Live &#8211; all is forgiven?</p>
<p>What do you think to the Bing logo and Sites? Please feel free to drop a comment below.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE </strong>There&#8217;s also <a href=" http://logoblink.com/2009/05/29/ms-bing-logo/" target="_blank">this great post</a> analysing the new bing logo at <strong>logoblink.com</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.postmodem.co.uk/2009/06/02/what-on-earth-were-microsoft-thinking-the-bing-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
